Protocols

Forgery or a Rothschild job like the Communist Manifesto?
WORLD CONQUEST 
   THROUGH WORLD GOVERNMENT

   The PROTOCOLS 
   of The LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION


         Translated from the Russian of Sergyei A. Nilus
                   by  VICTOR E. MARSDEN

        The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion has become a 
   best seller among political books published this century.
   
        Having been translated into every language since it was 
   first brought to light in 1919 and having reached over a million 
   sales in the English edition alone, this remarkable set of docu-
   ments is in greater demand than ever today.
   
        The years have shown that every great world event has fol-
   lowed the course laid down by the secret authors of this book.  
   Wars, slumps, revolutions, the rise in the cost of living and 
   chronic unrest are all foretold as leading to the ultimate goal 
   of World Conquest through the "back-door" means of first estab-
   lishing World Government "by consent."
   
        The thoughtful reader must reject the view, once held by 
   some people, that the Protocols originated as an imaginative work 
   of miraculous accuracy.  The only rational view seems to be that 
   the Protocols must be taken on their face value as a detailed 
   plan of action, aiming at nothing other than the goal they them-
   selves set forth.  This goal is a World State which the nations 
   are being urged by their leaders to accept as "the only alterna-
   tive to annihilation."  This is the choice which our politicians 
   are offering us today.
   
        The eighty-first impression of the Marsden translation was 
   presented under the new title World Conquest through World Gov-
   ernment because the publishers believed that the ultimate con-
   quest foretold in this terrible plan is nearing its final stages.

   TABLE OF CONTENTS
      
      FAMOUS VIEWS ON THE PROTOCOLS
      Introduction
      
          Protocol I          The Basic Doctrine
          Protocol II         Economic Wars
          Protocol III        Methods of Conquest
          Protocol IV         Materialism Replace Religion
          Protocol V          Despotism and Modern Progress
          Protocol VI         Take-Over Technique
          Protocol VII        World-Wide Wars
          Protocol VIII       Provisional Government
          Protocol IX         Re-education
          Protocol X          Preparing for Power
          Protocol XI         The Totalitarian State
          Protocol XII        Control of the Press
          Protocol XIII       Distractions
          Protocol XIV        Assault on Religion
          Protocol XV         Ruthless Suppression
          Protocol XVI        Brainwashing
          Protocol XVII       Abuse of Authority
          Protocol XVIII      Arrest of Opponents
          Protocol XIX        Rulers and People
          Protocol XX         Financial Programme
          Protocol XXI        Loans and Credit
          Protocol XXII       Power of Gold
          Protocol XXIII      Instilling Obedience
          Protocol XXIV       Qualities of the Ruler

          Epilogue
          Appendix
   
   
   FAMOUS VIEWS ON THE PROTOCOLS
   
        Uncanny Note Of Prophecy
        "Whence come this uncanny note of prophecy, prophecy in part 
   fulfilled, in parts far gone in the way of fulfillment?  Have we 
   been struggling these tragic years to ... extirpate the secret 
   organization of German world dominion only to find underneath it, 
   another, more dangerous because more secret?  Have we ... escaped 
   a Pax Germanica only to fall into a Pax Judaeica?
   
                                 The Times, London, May 8th, 1920
   
   
        Are They A Forgery?
        "A document forged to defame a people."
   
                                 The American Hebrew
   
   
        "A clumsy forgery."
             Lucien Wolf in The Spectator, London, June 12th, 1920
   
   
        "Upon that much-vexed subject the authenticity of ...  The 
   Protocols of Zion we shall not enter, except to say that if the 
   document is a forgery, as alleged, then it is one of the most 
   remarkable in the history of literature."
                       The Spectator, London, October 16th, 1920
   
   
        "Those who feel libeled by the Protocols have the most 
   obvious remedy in the world; all they have to do is to ruse and 
   denounce the policy of them, instead of denying the 
   authorship ... But when you come to read them how can any reason-
   able man deny the truth of what is contained in them??
                       Norman Jaques, M.P.,
                       in Canadian House of Commons, July 9th, 1943
   
   
        "On the one hand, the authenticity of this document cannot 
   be proved; on the other hand, the efforts made by some writers, 
   principally Jewish, to show it to be a forgery do not carry 
   conviction to many serious minds."
                  The Rev. Denny Fahey, C.S.Sp., B.A., D.D., 1939
   
   
        Too Terribly Real For Fiction
        "Whosoever was the mind that conceived them possessed a 
   knowledge of human nature, of history, and of statecraft which is 
   dazzling in its brilliant completeness, and terrible in the 
   objects to which it turns its power.  It is too terribly real for 
   fiction, too well sustained for speculation, to deep in its 
   knowledge of the secret springs of life for forgery."
                       The Dearborn Independent, July 10th, 1920.
   
   
        Confirmation From A Jew
        "The United Nations is Zionism.  It is the super government 
   mentioned many times in the Protocols of the Learned Elders of 
   Zion, promulgated between 1897 and 1905."
                            Henry Klein, New York, Jewish Lawyer,
                            in Zionism Rules the World, 1948.
   
   
        They Fit It Now
        "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols is 
   that they fit in with what is going on.  They are sixteen years 
   old and they have fitted the world situation up to this time.  
   They fit it now.
             Henry Ford in the New York World, February 17th, 1921

   
        "In the desires of a terrible and formidable sect, you have only 
   reached the first stages of the plans it has formed for that general Revo-
   lution which is to overthrow all thrones, all altars, annihilate all 
   property, efface all law, and end by dissolving all society."
   
        The Abbe Barruel (1797) writing on the Anti-Christian Conspiracy.   
                                       **
   
        "Unless Bolshevism is nipped in the bud immediately it is bound to 
   spread in one form or another all over Europe and the whole world, as it is 
   organized and worked by Jews who have no nationality and whose object is to 
   destroy for their own ends the existing order of things."
   
                       British Government White Paper, Russia No. 1 (1919)
   
                                       ***
   
        "There is now definite evidence that Bolshevism is an international 
   movement controlled by Jews; communications are passing between the leaders 
   in America, France,  Russia and England, with a view to concerted action."
   
             Directorate of Intelligence, Home Office, Scotland Yard, London, 
             in a Monthly Report to Foreign Embassies, 16th July, 1919.
   
                                       ***
   
        "This movement among the Jews is not new. From the days of Spartacus-
   Weishaupt to those of Karl Marx, and down to Trotsky (Russia), Bela Kun 
   (Hungary), Rosa Luxembourg (Germany), and Emma Goldman (United States), 
   this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the 
   reconstitution [reconstruction] of society on the basis of arrested devel-
   opment, of envious malevolence, and impossible equality, has been steadily 
   growing."
   
        Winston Churchill in Illustrated Sunday Herald, 8th February, 1920.
                                       ***
   
                                INTRODUCTION
   
        The Protocols of the Learned Elders of ZION may be briefly 
   described as a blueprint for the domination of the world by a 
   secret brotherhood.  Whatever may be the truth about their au-
   thorship - and, as will be shown, this has been the subject of 
   bitter dispute - there can be no doubt that the world society to 
   which they look forward is nothing more or less that a world 
   police state.
   
        The book is which the Protocols were first embodied was 
        published by Professor Sergyei A. Nilus in Russia in 1905, a 
        copy being received in the British Museum on August 10th, 
        1906, Professor Nilus's concern was to expose that he be-
        lieved to be a ruthless, cold-blooded conspiracy for the 
        destruction of Christian CIVILIZATION.  Early, in August and 
        September of 1903, the Russian newspaper SNAMIA had pub-
        lished the Protocols, and they are also believed to have 
        been published in the winter of 1902/1903 in the newspaper 
        MOSKOWSKIJA WIEDOMOSTI.  They remained unknown outside 
        Russia, however, until after the Bolshevik Revolution, when 
        Russian emigrants brought Nilus's book to North America and 
        Germany.
   
        The similarity between what was forecast in the Protocols 
   and the fate which had befallen Russia under the Bolsheviks was 
   so marked that, after these long years of neglect, they rapidly 
   became one of the most famous (or notorious) documents in the 
   world.
   
        In Bolshevik Russia, the penalty for their mere possession 
   was death.  It remains so to this day, both in the Soviet Union 
   and in the Satellite countries.  Outside the Iron Curtain, in 
   South Africa possession of the Protocols is also forbidden by 
   law, although the penalty is less drastic.
   
        As a result of their rapidly growing fame, numerous attempts 
   were made to discredit the Protocols as a forgery.  But it was 
   not until 1933 that the JEWS resorted to legal action.  On 26th 
   June, 1933, the FEDERATION of JEWISH COMMUNITY brought an action 
   against five members of the Swiss National Front, seeking a 
   judgment that the Protocols were a forgery and a prohibition of 
   their publication.  The procedure of the Court was astounding, 
   the provisions of the Swiss Civil Code being deliberately set 
   aside.  Sixteen witnesses called by the plaintiffs were heard, 
   but only one of the forty witnesses called by the defendants was 
   allowed a hearing.  The judge allowed the plaintiffs to appoint 
   two private stenographers to keep the register of proceedings 
   during the hearing of their witnesses, instead of entrusting the 
   task to a Court official.
   
        In view of these and similar irregularities, it was not 
   surprising that, after the case had lasted just on two years, the 
   Court pronounced the Protocols to be a forgery and demoralizing 
   literature.  The decision was given on 14th May, 1935, but it was 
   announced in the JEWISH PRESS before it was delivered by the 
   Court!

        On 1st November, 1937, the Swiss Court of Criminal Appeal 
   quashed this judgment in its entirety.  JEWISH PROPAGANDISTS, 
   however, still declare that the Protocols have been "proved" to 
   be a forgery.
   
        It is natural that the JEWS should try to discredit the 
   Protocols, for their growing fame was focusing more public atten-
   tion on other revealing utterances.
   
        In Disraeli's THE LIFE OF LORD GEORGE BENTINCK, written in 
   1852, there occurs this quotation: -
   
             "The influence of the JEWS may be traced in the last 
   outbreak of the destructive principle in Europe.  An insurrection 
   takes place against tradition and aristocracy, against religion 
   and property.  Destruction of the Semitic principles, extirpation 
   of the JEWISH RELIGION, whether in the Mosaic or the CHRISTIAN 
   form the natural equality of men and the abrogation of property 
   are proclaimed by the Secret Societies which form Provisional 
   Governments and men of the JEWISH RACE are found at the head of 
   every one of them.  The people of God cooperate with atheists; 
   the most skillful accumulators of property ally themselves with 
   Communists; the peculiar and chosen Race touch the hand of all 
   the scum and low castes of Europe; and all this because they wish 
   to destroy that ungrateful Christendom which owes to them its 
   name, and whose tyranny they can no longer endure."
   
        Max Norday, a JEW, speaking at the ZIONIST CONGRESS at Basel 
   in  August 1903, made this astonishing "prophecy":
   
             "Let me tell you the following words as if I  were 
        shoeing you the rungs of a ladder leading upward and upward: 
        Herzl, the ZIONIST CONGRESS, the English Uganda proposition, 
        the future world war, the peace conference, where with the 
        help of England a free and JEWISH PALESTINE will be  creat-
        ed."
   
        Walter Rathenau, the JEWISH BANKER behind the Kaiser, writ-
   ing in the German WIENER FREIE PRESSE, December 24, 1912, said:
   
             "Three hundred men, each of who knows all the others, 
        govern the fate of the European continent, and they elect 
        their successor from their entourage."
   
        Confirmation of Rathenau's statement came twenty years later 
   in 1931 when Jean Izoulet, a prominent member of the JEWISH 
   ALLIANCE ISRAELITE UNIVERSELLE, wrote in his PARIS LA CAPITALAE 
   DES RELIGIONS:
   
             "The meaning of the history of the last century is that 
        today 300 JEWISH FINANCIER, all Masters of Lodges, rule the 
        world."
   
        The LONDON JEWISH CHRONICLE, on April 4th, 1919, declared:
   
             "There is much in the fact of Bolshevism itself, in the 
        fact that so many JEWS are BOLSHEVISTS, in the fact that the 
        ideals of Bolshevism at many points are consonant with the 
        finest ideals of Judaism."
   
   and on March 15th, 1923, the JEWISH WORLD asserted:

             "Fundamentally JUDAISM is ANTI-CHRISTIAN."
   
        These and many similar assertions from JEWISH sources were 
   damaging enough  from the JEWISH point of view.  Taken in con-
   junction with the Protocols, with which more and more people were 
   becoming familiar, they were damning.
   
        The attitude of many people whose concern over the growing 
   attack on CHRISTIAN CIVILIZATION was rapidly increasing was 
   summed up by the late Henry Ford senior, the founder of the 
   world-famous motor manufacturing company.  In an interview pub-
   lished in the New York World on February 17th, 1921, Mr.  Ford 
   declared:
   
             "The only statement I care to make about the Protocols 
        is that they fit in with what is going on.  They are sixteen 
        years old, and have fitted the world situation up to this 
        time.  THEY FIT IT NOW."
   
        Those who, like Henry Ford, could see that "they fit it now" 
   only sixteen years after Nilus's first publication of the Proto-
   cols, naturally tended to concentrate their attention on the 
   relatively recent phenomenon of Bolshevism.  Few of them the 
   understood the equally dangerous, if more insidious, danger of 
   internationalism.
   
        Now, however, more than half a century after Nilus's publi-
   cation of the Protocols, the reality of that danger must be 
   crystal clear to anybody who views the world situation objectively.
   
        The Protocols are full of references to a "Super-
   Government," PROTOCOL VI, for example, states:
   
             "In every possible way we must develop the significance 
        of our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector 
        and Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us."
    
        That is exactly the way in which the United Nations special 
   agencies - UNESCO (U.N.  Educational, Scientific and Cultural 
   Organization); ILO (International Labour Organization); WHO 
   (World Health Organization); FAO (Food and Agriculture Organiza-
   tion); Commission of Human Rights; Genocide Convention, etc.  - 
   are represented.
   
        For some years there has been in existence an international 
   organization calling itself the World Association of Parliamen-
   tarians for World Government, which pursues the same objective as 
   that of another long-established international organization, 
   Federal Union.  This body does not disuse the fact that the 
   United Nations, by means of a few relatively minor changes in its 
   Charter, could be transformed virtually over night into a World 
   Government.
   
        There has long been agitation for the creation of a World 
   Police Force.  This would enable the United Nations Super-Govern-
   ment to function as a master of an all-powerful World Police 
   State, and the closing years of the 1950's have seen the agita-
   tors for a World Police Force come close to achieving their 
   objective.  The U.N.  Emergency Force, established after the Suez 
   crisis of 1956, has been openly regarded as a "pilot scheme."

        Should the few changes in the Charter necessary to transform 
   the U.N.  into a Super-Government be made, it will have in the 
   special agencies ready made Ministries of Education (or Propagan-
   da), Labor, Health, Food and Agriculture, "Justice", etc.
   
        Can it be an accident that these things are so accurately 
   for-shadowed in the Protocols?
   
        The full-scale World Super-Government is not the only, nor 
   perhaps the most immediate, danger.  It is obvious to everyone 
   that the nations of the East are being herded into subjection 
   under the dominance of the Soviet Union.  But what of the nations 
   of the West? Are they really the "free nations" which they are 
   popularly supposed to be?
   
        Far from it! They are being herded into that same sort of 
   pen as are the nations of the East under Communism.  Late in 
   1957, the process had gone for enough to be given an official 
   name.  That name was the policy of inter-dependence."
   
        The nations of the West are being brought under internation-
   al control at political, military and economic levels.  They are 
   rapidly in process of becoming controlled also on the social 
   level.  All alike are being told that their only hope lies in the 
   surrender of national sovereignty.
   
        National Parliaments must give way to such bodies as the 
   Council of Europe or the Atlantic Council.  National Forces must 
   be submerged in such bodies as the North Atlantic Treaty Organi-
   zation (NATO), the Baghdad Pact or the South-East Treaty Organi-
   zation (SEATO), so that no nation has control over its own means 
   of defense.  National economies must be submerged in such bodies 
   as the Organization for European Economic Cooperation (OEEC), the 
   European Payments Union (EPU) or the World Bank, so that no 
   nation may control its own economic destiny.
   
        Even on the social level, individual national distinctions 
   must disappear.  For example, under the "Common Market" Treaty 
   which unites six European nations on the economic plane, provi-
   sion is made for the "equalization of social policies."  And 
   strenuous efforts have been made to herd other European nations, 
   Great Britain among them, into this same pen in the associated 
   European Free Trade Area.
   
        In 1934, when the leader of the British Labor Party (Mr.  
   Clement Attlee) told the party's annual conference:
   
             "We are deliberately putting loyalty to a world order 
        above loyalty to our own country," he was widely execrated.
   
        Twenty-three years of propaganda, however, leave their mark, 
   and when, in 1957, a Conservative Prime Minister of Britain told 
   the British people that they must surrender some of their nation-
   al sovereignty to an unknown international cabal, scarcely a 
   voice was raise in protest.  At the close of 1957 there was an 
   official declaration of the British Government's support for the 
   plan which was foreshadowed in the Protocols over sixty years 
   ago.  The Earl of Gosford, Joint Under-Secretary of State for 
   Foreign Affairs, said in the House of Lords on 7th November, 
   1957:
   
             "Her Majesty's Government are fully in agreement with 
        World Government.  We agree that this must be the goal, and 
        that every step that is humanly possible must be taken to 
        reach that goal."
   
        All over the world "federation", "integration", "regionali-
   zation" and "inter-dependence" are the order of the day.  All 
   this is foreshadowed in the Protocols, published more than 
   half-a-century ago by Sergyei Nilus, which, we are told are 
   forgery.
   
        Can this be coincidence? Could any forger be so prescient?
   
        Or are the Protocols what Nilus and many others believed 
   them to be - the blueprint for a conspiracy to destroy CHRISTIAN 
   CIVILIZATION and place the whole world under the domination of a 
   small, secret cabal?
   
   
                                 NOTES
   
                  I - "AGENTURE" and "THE POLITICAL"
   
        There are two words in this translation which are unusual, 
   the words "Agentur" and "political" used as substantives.  
   "Agentur" appears to be adopted from the original test and it 
   means the whole body of agents and agencies directed by the 
   Elders, whether members of the tribe or their GENTILE tools.
   
        By "the Political" is meant not exactly the "body politic" 
   but the entire machinery of politics.
What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (1)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

32 thoughts on “Protocols

  1. II – The Symbolic Snake of Judaism

    Christ Serpent

    Chapter III opens with a reference to the symbolic Snake of
    Judaism. In his Epilogue to the 1905 Edition of the Protocols
    Nilus gives the following interesting account of this symbol:

    According to the records of secret JEWISH ZIONISM, Solomon
    and other JEWISH learned men had already, in 929 B.C., thought
    out a theoretical scheme for the peaceful conquest of the whole
    universe by ZION.

    As history developed, this scheme was worked out in detail
    and completed by men who were subsequently initiated in this
    question. The learned men decided by peaceful means to conquer
    the world for ZION with the slyness of the Symbolic Snake, whose
    head was to represent those who have been initiated into the
    plans of the JEWISH PEOPLE – the administration was always kept
    secret, even from the JEWISH NATION itself. As this Snake pene-
    trated into the hearts of the nations which it encountered it
    undermined and devoured all the NON-JEWISH power of these States.
    It is foretold that the Snake has sill to finish its work,
    strictly adhering to the designed plan, until the course which it
    has to run is closed by the return of its head to ZION and until,
    by this means, the Snake has completed its round of Europe and
    has encircled it – and until, by dint of enchaining Europe, it
    has encompassed the whole world. This it is to accomplish by
    using every endeavor to subdue the other countries by an economic
    conquest.

    The return of the head of the Snake to ZION can only be
    accomplished after the power of all the Sovereigns of Europe has
    been laid low, that is to say, when by means of economic crises
    and wholesale destruction effected everywhere, there shall have
    been brought about a spiritual demoralization and a moral corrup-
    tion, chiefly with the assistance of JEWISH WOMEN masquerading as
    French, Italians, etc. These are the surest spreader of licen-
    tiousness into the lives of the leading men at the heads of
    nations.

    A map of the course of the Symbolic Snake is shown as fol-
    lows: Its first stage in Europe was in 429 B.C. in Greece,
    where, about the time of Pericles, the Snake first started eating
    into the power of that country. The second stage was in Rome in
    the time of Augustus, about 69 B.C. The third in Madrid in the
    times of Charles V, in A.D. 1552. The fourth in Paris about
    1790, in the time of Louis XVI. The fifth in London from 1814
    onwards (after the downfall of Napoleon). The sixth in Berlin in
    1871 after the Franco-Prussian war. The seventh in St. Peters-
    burg, over which is drawn the head of the Snake under the date
    1881.

    After these states which the Snake traversed have had the
    foundations of their constitutions shaken, Germany, with its
    apparent power, forming no exception to the rule. In economic
    conditions England and Germany are spared by the Snake, on which
    at present [i.e., 1905] all its efforts are concentrated. The
    future course of the Snake is not shown on this map, but arrows
    indicate its next movement towards Moscow, Kiev, and Odessa.

    It is now well know to us to what extent the latter cities
    form the centers of the militant JEWISH RACE. Constantinople is
    shown as the last of the Snake’s course before it reaches Jerusa-
    lem.

  2. III – The term “Goyim”

    gene gentiles

    Meaning GENTILES or NON-JEW, is used throughout the Proto-
    cols and is retained by Mr. Marsden.

    The Protocols
    ————-

    In 1884 the daughter of a Russian general, Mlle. Justine
    Glinka, was endeavoring to serve her country in Paris by
    obtaining political information, which she communicated to
    General Orgevskii in St. Petersburg. For this purpose she
    employed a Jew, Joseph Schorst, member of the Mizraim Lodge in
    Paris. One day Schorst offered to obtain for her a document of
    great importance to Russia, on payment of 2,500 francs. This sum
    being received from St. Petersburg was paid over and the document
    handed to Mlle. Glinka.
    She forwarded the French original, accompanied by a Russian
    translation, to Orgevskii, who in turn handed it to his chief,
    General Cherevin, for transmission to the Tsar. But Cherevin,
    under obligation to wealthy Jews, refused to transmit it, merely
    filing it in the archives.
    Meantime there appeared in Paris certain books on Russian
    court life which displeased the Tsar, who ordered his secret
    police to discover their authorship. This was falsefy attributed,
    perhaps with malicious intent, to Mlle. Glinka, and on her return
    to Russia she was banished to her estate in Orel. To the marechal
    de noblesse of this district, Alexis Sukhotin, Mlle. Glinka gave
    a copy of the Protocols. Sukhotin showed the document to two
    friends, Stepanov and Nilus; the former had it printed and
    circulated privately in 1897; the second, Professor Sergius A.
    Nilus, published it for the first time in Tsarskoe-Tselc (Russia)
    in 1901, in a book entitled The Great Within the Small. Then,
    about the same time, a friend of Nilus, G. Butmi, also brought it
    out and a copy was deposited in the British Museum on August 10,
    1906.
    Meantime, through Jewish members of the Russian police,
    minutes of the proceedings of the Basle congress in 1897 had been
    obtained and these were found to correspond with the Protocols.
    In January 1917, Nilus had prepared a second edition,
    revised and documented, for publication. But before it could be
    put on the market, the revolution of March 1917 had taken place
    and Kerenski, who had succeded to power, ordered the whole
    edition of Nilus’s book to be destroyed. In 1924, Prof. Nilus was
    arrested by the Cheka in Kiev, imprisoned, and tortured; he was
    told by the Jewish president of the court, that this treatment
    was meted out to him for “having done them incalculable harm in
    publishing the Protocols”. Released for a few months, he was
    again led before the G.P.U. (Cheka), this time in Moscow and
    confined. Set at liberty in February 1926, he died in exile in
    the district of Vladimir on January 13, 1929.]

    [This is a Russian edition by Sergius A. Nilus in 1905]

    [Translated from the Russian Text by Victor E. Marsden —
    Formerly Russian Correspondent of “The Morning Post”]

  3. PROTOCOLS
    OF THE MEETINGS OF THE
    LEARNED ELDERS OF ZION
    ———-

    eternal jew

    PROTOCOL NO. 1

    Right lies in Might. Freedom — an idea only. Liberalism.
    Gold. Faith. Self-Government. Despotism of Capital. The
    internal foe. The Mob. Anarchy. Politics versus Morals. The
    Right of the strong. The Invincibility of Jew-Masonic
    authority. End justifies Means. The Mob a Blind Man.
    Political A.B.C. Party Discord. Most satisfactory form of
    rule-Despotism. Alcohol. Classicism. Corruption. Principles
    and rules of the Jew-Masonic Government. Terror. ”Liberty,
    Equality, Fraternity.” Principle of Dynastic Rule.
    Annihilation of the privileges of the Goy-Aristocracy (i.e.,
    non-Jew). The New Aristocracy. The psychological
    calculation. Abstractness of “Liberty.” Power of removal of
    representatives of the people.

    …..Putting aside fine phrases we shall speak of the
    significance of each thought: by comparisons and deductions we
    shall throw light upon surrounding facts.
    What I am about to set forth, then, is our system
    from the two point[s] of view, that of ourselves and that of
    the goyim (i.e., non-Jews).
    It must be noted that men with bad instincts are more
    in number than the good, and therefore the best results in
    governing them are attained by violence and terrorization, and
    not by academic discussions. Every man aims at power, everyone
    would like to become a dictator if only he could, and rare indeed
    are the men who would not be willing to sacrifice the welfare of
    all for the sake of securing their own welfare.
    What has restrained the beasts of prey who are called men?
    What has served for their guidance hitherto?
    In the beginnings of the structure of society they were
    subjected to brutal and blind force; afterwards — to Law, which
    is the same force, only disguised. I draw the conclusion that by
    the law of nature right lies in force.
    Political freedom is an idea but not a fact. This idea one
    must know how to apply whenever it appears necessary with this
    bait of an idea to attract the masses of the people to one’s
    party for the purpose of crushing another who is in authority.
    This task is rendered easier if the opponent has himself been
    infected with the idea of freedom, so-called liberalism, and, for
    the sake of an idea, is willing to yield some of his power. It is
    precisely here that the triumph of our theory appears: the
    slackened reins of government are immediately, by the law of
    life, caught up and gathered together by a new hand, because the
    blind might of the nation cannot for one single day exist without
    guidance, and the new authority merely fits into the place of the
    old already weakened by liberalism.
    In our day the power which has replaced that of the rulers
    who were liberal is the power of Gold. Time was when Faith ruled.
    The idea of freedom is impossible of realization because no one
    knows how to use it with moderation. It is enough to hand over a
    people to self-government for a certain length of time for that
    people to be turned into a disorganized mob. From that moment on
    we get internecine strife which soon develops into battles
    between classes, in the midst of which States burn down and their
    importance is reduced to that of a heap of ashes.
    Whether a State exhausts itself in its own convulsions,
    whether its internal discord brings it under the power of
    external foes — in any case it can be accounted irretrievably
    lost: it is in our power. The despotism of Capital, which is
    entirely in our hands, reaches out to it a straw that the State,
    willy-nilly, must take hold of: if not — it goes to the bottom.
    Should anyone of a liberal mind say that such reflections as
    the above are immoral I would put the following questions: — If
    every State has two foes and if in regard to the external foe it
    is allowed and not considered immoral to use every manner and art
    of conflict, as for example to keep the enemy in ignorance of
    plans of attack and defence, to attack him by night or in
    superior numbers, then in what way can the same means in regard
    to a worse foe, the destroyer of the structure of society and the
    commonweal, be called immoral and not permissible?
    Is it possible for any sound logical mind to hope with any
    success to guide crowds by the aid of reasonable counsels and
    arguments, when any objection or contradiction, senseless though
    it may be, can be made and when such objection may find more
    favour with the people, whose powers of reasoning are
    superficial? Men in masses and the men of the masses, being
    guided solely by petty passions, paltry beliefs, customs,
    traditions and sentimental theorism, fall a prey to party
    dissension, which hinders any kind of agreement even on the basis
    of a perfectly reasonable argument. Every resolution of a crowd
    depends upon a chance or packed majority, which, in its ignorance
    of political secrets, put forth some ridiculous resolution that
    lays in the administration a seed of anarchy.
    The political has nothing in common with the moral. The
    ruler who is governed by the moral is not a skilled politician,
    and is therefore unstable on his throne. He who wishes to rule
    must have recource both to cunning and to make-believe. Great
    national qualities, like frankness and honesty, are vices in
    politics, for they bring down rulers from their thrones more
    effectively and more certainly than the most powerful enemy. Such
    qualities must be the attributes of the kingdoms of the goyim,
    but we must in no wise be guided by them.
    Our right lies in force. The word “right” is an abstract
    thought and proved by nothing. The word means no more than: —
    Give me what I want in order that thereby I may have a proof that
    I am stronger than you.
    Where does right begin? Where does it end?
    In any State in which there is a bad organization of
    authority, an impersonality of laws and of the rulers who have
    lost their personality amid the flood of rights ever multiplying
    out of liberalism, I find a new right — to attack by the right
    of the strong, and to scatter to the winds all existing forces of
    order and regulation, to reconstruct all institutions and to
    become the sovereign lord of those who have left to us the rights
    of their power by laying them down voluntarily in their
    liberalism.
    Our power in the present tottering condition of all forms of
    power will be more invisible than any other, because it will
    remain invisible until the moment when it has gained such
    strength that no cunning can any longer undermine it.
    Out of the temporary evil we are now compelled to commit
    will emerge the good of an unshakeable rule, which will restore
    the regular course of the machinery of the national life, brought
    to naught by liberalism. The result justifies the means. Let us,
    however, in our plans, direct our attention not so much to what
    is good and moral as to what is necessary and useful.
    Before us is a plan in which is laid down strategically the
    line from which we cannot deviate without running the risk of
    seeing the labour of many centuries brought to naught.
    In order to elaborate satisfactory forms of action it is
    necessary to have regard to the rascality, the slackness, the
    instability of the mob, its lack of capacity to understand and
    respect the conditions of its own life, or its own welfare. It
    must be understood that the might of a mob is blind, senseless
    and unreasoning force ever at the mercy of a suggestion from any
    side. The blind cannot lead the blind without bringing them into
    the abyss; consequently, members of the mob, upstarts from the
    people even though they should be as a genius for wisdom, yet
    having no understanding of the political, cannot come forward as
    leaders of the mob without bringing the whole nation to ruin.
    Only one trained from childhood for independent rule can
    have understanding of the words that can be made up of the
    political alphabet.
    A people left to itself i.e., to upstarts from its midst,
    brings itself to ruin by party dissensions excited by the pursuit
    of power and honours and the disorders arising therefrom, Is it
    possible for the masses of the people calmly and without petty
    jealousies to form judgments, to deal with the affairs of the
    country, which cannot be mixed up with personal interests? Can
    they defend themselves from an external foe? It is unthinkable,
    for a plan broken up into as many parts as there are heads in the
    mob, loses all homogeneity, and thereby becomes unintelligible
    and impossible of execution.
    It is only with a despotic ruler that plans can be
    elaborated extensively and clearly in such a way as to distribute
    the whole properly among the several parts of the machinery of
    the State: from this the conclusion is inevitable that a
    satisfactory form of government for any country is one that
    concentrates in the hands of one responsible person. Without an
    absolute despotism there can be no existence for civilization
    which is carried on not by the masses but by their guide,
    whosoever that person may be. The mob is a savage and displays
    its savagery at every opportunity. The moment the mob seizes
    freedom in its hands it quickly turns to anarchy, which in itself
    is the highest degree of savagery.
    Behold the alcoholized animals, bemused with drink, the
    right to an immoderate use of which comes along with freedom. It
    is not for us and ours to walk that road. The peoples of the
    goyim are bemused with alcoholic liquors; their youth has grown
    stupid on classicism and from early immorality, into which it has
    been inducted by our special agents — by tutors, lackeys,
    governesses in the houses of the wealthy, by clerks and others,
    by our women in the places of dissipation frequented by the
    goyim. In the number of these last I count also the so-called
    “society ladies,” voluntary followers of the others in corruption
    and luxury.
    Our countersign is — Force and Make-believe. Only force
    conquers in political affairs, especially if it be concealed in
    the talents essential to statesmen. Violence must be the
    principle, and cunning and make-believe the rule for governments
    which do not want to lay down their crowns at the feet of agents
    of some new power. This evil is the one and only means to attain
    the end, the good. Therefore we must not stop at bribery, deceit
    and treachery when they should serve towards the attainment of
    our end. In politics one must know how to seize the property of
    others without hesitation if by it we secure submission and
    sovereignty.
    Our State, marching along the path of peaceful conquest, has
    the right to replace the horrors of war by less noticeable and
    more satisfactory sentences of death, necessary to maintain the
    terror which tends to produce blind submission. Just but
    merciless severity is the greatest factor of strength in the
    State: not only for the sake of gain but also in the name of
    duty, for the sake of victory, we must keep to the programme of
    violence and make-believe. The doctrine of squaring accounts is
    precisely as strong as the means of which it makes use. Therefore
    it is not so much by the means themselves as by the doctrine of
    severity that we shall triumph and bring all governments into
    subjection to our super-government. It is enough for them to know
    that we are merciless for all disobedience to cease.
    Far back in ancient times we were the first to cry among the
    masses of the people the words “Liberty, Equality, Fraternity,”
    words many times repeated since those days by stupid poll-parrots
    who from all sides round flew down upon these baits and with them
    carried away the well-being of the world, true freedom of the
    individual, formerly so well guarded against the pressure of the
    mob. The would-be wise men of the goyim, the intellectuals, could
    not make anything out of the uttered words in their abstractness;
    did not note the contradiction of their meaning and inter-
    relation: did not see that in nature there is no equality, cannot
    be freedom; that Nature herself has established inequality of
    minds, of characters, and capacities, just as immutably as she
    has established subordination to her laws: never stopped to think
    that the mob is a blind thing, that upstarts elected from among
    it to bear rule are, in regard to the political, the same blind
    men as the mob itself, that the adept, though he be a fool, can
    yet rule, whereas the non-adept, even if he were a genius,
    understands nothing in the political — to all these things the
    goyim paid no regard; yet all the time it was based upon these
    things that dynastic rule rested: the father passed on to the son
    a knowledge of the course of political affairs in such wise that
    none should know it but members of the dynasty and none could
    betray it to the governed. As time went on the meaning of the
    dynastic transference of the true position of affairs in the
    political was lost, and this aided the success of our cause.
    In all corners of the earth the words “Liberty, Equality,
    Fraternity” brought to our ranks, thanks to our blind agents,
    whole legions who bore our banners with enthusiasm. And all the
    time these words were canker-worms at work boring into the well-
    being of the goyim, putting an end everywhere to peace, quiet,
    solidarity and destroying all the foundations of the goya States.
    As you will see later, this helped us to our triumph; it gave us
    the possibility, among other things, of getting into our hands
    the master card — the destruction of the privileges, or in other
    words of the very existence of the aristocracy of the goyim, that
    class which was the only defense peoples and countries had
    against us. On the ruins of the natural and genealogical
    aristocracy of the goyim we have set up the aristocracy of our
    educated class headed by the aristocracy of money. The
    qualifications for this aristocracy we have established in
    wealth, which is dependent upon us, and in knowledge, for which
    our learned elders provide the motive force.
    Our triumph has been rendered easier by the fact that in our
    relations with the men whom we wanted we have always worked upon
    the most sensitive chords of the human mind, upon the cash
    account, upon the cupidity, upon the insatiability for material
    needs of man: and each one of these human weaknesses, taken
    alone, is sufficient to paralyse initiative, for it hands over
    the will of men to the disposition of him who has bought their
    activities.
    The abstraction of freedom has enabled us to persuade the
    mob in all countries that their government is nothing but the
    steward of the people who are the owners of the country, and that
    the steward may be replaced like a worn-out glove.
    It is this possibility of replacing the representatives of
    the people which has placed them at our disposal, and, as it
    were, given us the power of appointment.

  4. PROTOCOL NO. 2

    Economic Wars–the foundation of the Jewish predominance.
    Figure-head government and “secret advisers.” Successes of
    destructive doctrines. Adaptability in politics. Part played
    by the Press. Cost of gold and value of Jewish sacrifice.

    It is indispensable for our purpose that wars, so far as
    possible, should not result in territorial gains: war will thus
    be brought on to the economic ground, where the nations will not
    fail to perceive in the assistance we give the strength of our
    predominance, and this state of things will put both sides at the
    mercy of our international agentur; which possesses millions of
    eyes ever on the watch and unhampered my any limitations
    whatsoever. Our international rights will then wipe out national
    rights, in the proper sense of right, and will rule the nations
    precisely as the civil law of States rules the relations of their
    subjects among themselves.
    The administrators, whom we shall choose from among the
    public, with strict regard to their capacities for servile
    obedience, will not be persons trained in the arts of government,
    and will therefore easily become pawns in our game in the hands
    of men of learning and genius who will be their advisers,
    specialists bred and reared from early childhood to rule the
    affairs of the whole world. As is well known to you, these
    specialists of ours have been drawing to fit them for rule the
    information they need from our political plans from the lessons
    of history, from observations made of the events of every moment
    as it passes. The goyim are not guided by practical use of
    unprejudiced historical observation, but by theoretical routine
    without any critical regard for consequent results. We need not,
    therefore, take any account of them — let them amuse themselves
    until the hour strikes, or live on hopes of new forms of
    enterprising pastime, or on the memories of all they have
    enjoyed. For them let that play the principal part which we have
    persuaded them to accept as the dictates of science (theory). It
    is with this object in view that we are constantly, by means of
    our press, arousing a blind confidence in these theories. The
    intellectuals of the goyim will puff themselves up with their
    knowledge and without any logical verification of them will put
    into effect all the information available from science, which our
    agentur specialists have cunningly pieced together for the
    purpose of educating their minds in the direction we want.
    Do not suppose for a moment that these statements are empty
    words: think carefully of the successes we arranged for
    Darwinism, Marxism, Nietzscheism. To us Jews, at any rate, it
    should be plain to see what a disintegrating importance these
    directives have had upon the minds of the goyim.
    It is indispensable for us to take account of the thoughts,
    characters, tendencies of the nations in order to avoid making
    slips in the political and in the direction of administrative
    affairs. The triumph of our system, of which the component parts
    of the machinery may be variously disposed according to the
    temperament of the peoples met on our way, will fail of success
    if the practical application of it be not based upon a summing up
    of the lessons of the past in the light of the present.
    In the hands of the States of to-day there is a great force
    that creates the movement of thought in the people, and that is
    the Press. The part played by the Press is to keep pointing out
    requirements supposed to be indispensable, to give voice to the
    complaints of the people, to express and create discontent. It is
    in the Press that the triumph of freedom of speech finds its
    incarnation. But the goyim States have not known how to make use
    of this force; and it has fallen into our hands. Through the
    Press we have gained the power to influence while remaining
    ourselves in the shade: thanks to the Press we have got the
    gold in our hands, notwithstanding that we have had to gather
    it out of the oceans of blood and tears. But it has paid us,
    though we have sacrificed many of our people. Each victim on
    our side is worth in the sight of God a thousand goyim.

  5. PROTOCOL NO. 3

    The Symbolic Snake and its significance. The instability of
    the constitutional scales. Terror in the palaces. Power and
    ambition. Parliaments “talkeries,” pamphlets. Abuse of
    power. Economic slavery. “People’s Rights.” Monopolist
    system and the aristocracy. The Army of Mason-Jewry.
    Decrescence of the Goyim. Hunger and rights of capital. The
    mob and the coronation of “The Sovereign Lord of all the
    World.” The fundamental precept in the programme of the
    future Masonic national schools. The secret of the science
    of the structure of society. Universal economic crisis.
    Security of “ours” (i.e., our people, Jews). The despotism
    of Masonry — the kingdom of reason. Loss of the guide.
    Masonry and the great French Revolution. The King Despot of
    the blood of Zion. Causes of the invinsibility of Masonry.
    Part played by secret masonic agents. Freedom.

    Today I may tell you that our goal is now only a few steps
    off. There remains a small space to cross and the whole long path
    we have trodden is ready now to close its cycle of the Symbolic
    Snake, by which we symbolize our people. When this ring closes,
    all the States of Europe will be locked in its coil as in a
    powerful vice.
    The constitution scales of these days will shortly break
    down, for we have established them with a certain lack of
    accurate balance in order that they may oscillate incessantly
    until they wear through the pivot on which they turn. The goyim
    are under the impression that they have welded them sufficiently
    strong and they have all along kept on expecting that the scales
    would come into equilibrium. But the pivots — the kings on their
    thrones — are hemmed in by their representatives, who play the
    fool, distraught with their own uncontrolled and irresponsible
    power. This power they owe to the terror which has been breathed
    into the palaces. As they have no means of getting at their
    people, into their very midst, the kings on their thrones are no
    longer able to come to terms with them and so strengthen
    themselves against seekers after power. We have made a gulf
    between the far-seeing Sovereign Power and the blind force of the
    people so that both have lost all meaning, for like the blind man
    and his stick, both are powerless apart.
    In order to incite seekers after power to a misuse of power
    we have set all forces in opposition one to another, breaking up
    their liberal tendencies towards independence. To this end we
    have stirred up every form of enterprise we have armed all
    parties, we have set up authority as a target for every ambition.
    Of States we have made gladiatorial arenas where a host of
    confused issues contend. A little more, and disorders and
    bankruptcy will be universal.
    Babblers inexhaustible have turned into oratorical contests
    the sittings of Parliament and Administrative Boards. Bold
    journalists and unscrupulous pamphleteers daily fall upon
    executive officials. Abuses of power will put the final touch in
    preparing all institutions for their overthrow and everything
    will fly skyward under the blows of the maddened mob.
    All people are chained down to heavy toil by poverty more
    firmly than ever they were chained by slavery and serfdom; from
    these, one way and another, they might free themselves, these
    could be settled with, but from want they will never get away. We
    have included in the constitution such rights as to the masses
    appear fictitious and not actual rights. All these so-called
    “People’s Rights” can exist only in idea, an idea which can never
    be realized in practical life. What is it to the proletariat
    labourer, bowed double over his heavy toll, crushed by his lot in
    life, if talkers get the right to bable, if journalists get the
    right to scribble any nonsense side by side with good stuff, once
    the proletariat has no other profit out of the constitution save
    only those pitiful crumbs which we fling them from our table in
    return for their voting in favour of what we dictate, in favour
    of the men we place in power, the servants of our agentur….
    Republican rights for a poor man are no more than a bitter piece
    of irony, for the necessity he is under of toiling almost all day
    gives him no present use of them, but on the other hand robs him
    of all guarantee of regular and certain earnings by making him
    dependent on strikes by his comrades or lockouts by his masters.
    The people under our guidance have annihilated the
    aristocracy, who were their one and only defence and foster-
    mother for the sake of their own advantage which is inseparably
    bound up with the well-being of the people. Nowadays, with the
    destruction of the aristocracy, the people have fallen into the
    grips of merciless money-grinding scoundrels who have laid a
    pitiless and cruel yoke upon the necks of the workers.
    We appear on the scene as alleged saviours of the worker
    from this oppression when we propose to him to enter the ranks of
    our fighting forces — Socialists, Anarchists, Communists — to
    whom we always give support in accordance with an alleged
    brotherly rule (of the solidarity of all humanity) of our social
    masonry. The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the
    workers, was interested in seeing that the workers were well fed,
    healthy and strong. We are interested in just the opposite — in
    the deminution, the killing out of the GOYIM. Our power is in the
    chronic shortness of food and physical weakness of the worker
    because by all that this implies he is made the slave of our
    will, and he will not find in his own authorities either strength
    or energy to set against our will. Hunger creates the right of
    capital to rule the worker more surely than it was given to the
    aristocracy by the legal authority of kings.
    By want and the envy and hatred which it engenders we shall
    move the mobs and with their hands we shall wipe out all those
    who hinder us on our way.
    When the hour strikes for our Sovereign Lord of all the
    World to be crowned it is these same hands which will sweep away
    everything that might be a hindrance thereto.
    The goyim have lost the habit of thinking unless prompted by
    the suggestions of our specialists. Therefore they do not see the
    urgent necessity of what we, when our kingdom comes, shall adopt
    at once, namely this, that it is essential to teach in national
    schools one simple, true piece of knowledge, the basis of all
    knowledge — the knowledge of the structure of human life, of
    social existence, which requires division of labour, and,
    consequently, the division of men into classes and conditions. It
    is essential for all to know that owing to difference in the
    objects of human activity there cannot be any equality, that he
    who by any act of his compromises a whole class cannot be equally
    responsible before the law with him who affects no one but only
    his own honour. The true knowledge of the structure of society,
    into the secrets of which we do not admit the goyim, would
    demonstrate to all men that the positions and work must be kept
    within a certain circle, that they may not become a source of
    human suffering, arising from an education which does not
    correspond with the work which individuals are called upon to do.
    After a thorough study of this knowledge the peoples will
    voluntarily submit to authority and accept such position as is
    appointed them in the State. In the present state of knowledge
    and the direction we have given to its development the people,
    blindly believing things in print — cherishes — thanks to
    promptings intended to mislead and to its own ignorance — a
    blind hatred towards all conditions which it considers above
    itself, for it has no understanding of the meaning of class and
    condition.
    This hatred will be still further magnified by the effects
    of an economic crisis, which will stop dealings on the exchanges
    and bring industry to a standstill. We shall create by all the
    secret subterranean methods open to us and with the aid of gold,
    which is all in our hands, a universal economic crisis whereby we
    shall throw upon the streets whole mobs of workers simultaneously
    in all the countries of Europe. These mobs will rush delightedly
    to shed the blood of those whom, in the simplicity of their
    ignorance, they have envied from their cradles, and whose
    property they will then be able to loot.
    “Ours” they will not touch, because the moment of attack
    will be known to us and we shall take measures to protect our
    own.
    We have demonstrated that progress will bring all the goyim
    to the sovereignty of reason. Our despotism will be precisely
    that; for it will know how by wise severities to pacificate all
    unrest, to cauterise liberalism out of all institutions.
    When the populace has seen that all sorts of concessions and
    indulgences are yielded it in the name of freedom it has imagined
    itself to be sovereign lord and has stormed its way to power,
    but, naturally, like every other blind man it has come upon a
    host of stumbling blocks, it has rushed to find a guide, it has
    never had the sense to return to the former state and it has laid
    down its plenipotentiary powers at our feet. Remember the French
    Revolution, to which it was we who gave the name of “Great”: the
    secrets of its preparations are well known to us for it was
    wholly the work of our hands.
    Ever since that time we have been leading the peoples from
    one disenchantment to another, so that in the end they should
    turn also from us in favour of that King-Despot of the blood of
    Zion, whom we are preparing for the world.
    At the present day we are, as an international force,
    invincible, because if attacked by some we are supported by other
    States. It is the bottomless rascality of the goyim peoples, who
    crawl on their bellies to force, but are merciless towards
    weakness, unsparing to faults and indulgent to crimes, unwilling
    to bear the contradictions of a free social system but patient
    unto martyrdom under the violence of a bold despotism — it is
    those qualities which are aiding us to independence. From the
    premier-dictators of the present day the goyim peoples suffer
    patiently and bear such abuses as for the least of them they
    would have beheaded twenty kings.
    What is the explanation of this phenomenon, this curious
    inconsequence of the masses of the peoples in their attitude
    towards what would appear to be events of the same order?
    It is explained by the fact that these dictators whisper to
    the peoples through their agents that through these abuses they
    are inflicting injury on the States with the highest purpose —
    to secure the welfare of the peoples, the international
    brotherhood of them all, their solidarity and equality of rights.
    Naturally they do not tell the peoples that this unification must
    be accomplished only under our sovereign rule.
    And thus the people condemn the upright and acquit the
    guilty, persuaded ever more and more that it can do whatsoever it
    wishes. Thanks to this state of things the people are destroying
    every kind of stability and creating disorders at every step.
    The word “freedom” brings out the communities of men to
    fight against every kind of force, against every kind of
    authority, even against God and the laws of nature. For this
    reason we, when we come into our kingdom, shall have to erase
    this word from the lexicon of life as implying a principle of
    brute force which turns mobs into bloodthirsty beasts.
    These beasts, it is true, fall asleep again every time when
    they have drunk their fill of blood, and at such times can easily
    be riveted into their chains. But if they be not given blood they
    will not sleep and continue the struggle.

  6. PROTOCOL NO. 4

    Stages of a Republic. Gentile Masonry. Freedom and Faith.
    International Industrial Competition. Role of Speculation.
    Cult of Gold.

    Every republic passes through several stages. The first of
    these is comprised in the early days of mad raging by the blind
    mob, tossed hither and thither, right and left: the second is
    demagogy, from which is born anarchy, and that leads inevitably
    to despotism — not any longer legal and overt, and therefore
    responsible despotism, but to unseen and secretly hidden, yet
    nevertheless sensibly felt despotism in the hands of some secret
    organization or other, whose acts are the more unscrupulous
    inasmuch as it works behind a screen, behind the backs of all
    sorts of agents, the changing of whom not only does not
    injuriously affect but actually aids the secret force by saving
    it, thanks to continual changes, from the necessity of expending
    its resources on the rewarding of long services.
    Who and what is in a position to overthrow an invisible
    force? And this is precisely what our force is. Gentile masonry
    blindly serves as a screen for us and our objects, but the plan
    of action of our force, even its very abiding place, remains for
    the whole people an unknown mystery.
    But even freedom might be harmless and have its place in the
    State economy without injury to the well-being of the peoples if
    it rested upon the foundation of faith in God, upon the
    brotherhood of humanity, unconnected with the conception of
    equality, which is negatived by the very laws of creation, for
    they have established subordination. With such a faith as this a
    people might be governed by a wardship of parishes, and would
    walk contentedly and humbly under the guiding hand of its
    spiritual pastor submitting to the dispositions of God upon
    earth. This is the reason why it is indespensable for us to
    undermine all faith, to tear of minds out of the GOYIM the very
    principle of Godhead and the spirit, and to put in its place
    arithmetical calculations and material needs.
    In order to give the goyim no time to think and take note,
    their minds must be diverted towards industry and trade. Thus,
    all the nations will be swallowed up in the pursuit of gain and
    in the race for it will not take note of their common foe. But
    again, in order that freedom may once for all disintegrate and
    ruin the communities of the goyim, we must put industry on a
    speculative basis: the result of this will be that what is
    withdrawn from the land by industry will slip through the hands
    and pass into speculation, that is, to our classes.
    The intensified struggle for superiority and shocks
    delivered to economic life will create, nay, have already
    created, disenchanted, cold and heartless communities. Such
    communities will foster a strong aversion towards the higher
    political and towards religion. Their only guide is gain, that is
    Gold, which they will erect into a veritable cult, for the sake
    of those material delights which it can give. Then will the hour
    strike when, not for the sake of attaining the good, not even to
    win wealth, but solely out of hatred towards the privileged, the
    lower classes of the goyim will follow our lead against our
    rivals for power, the intellectuals of the goyim.

  7. PROTOCOL NO. 5

    Creation of an intensified centralization of government.
    Methods of seizing power by masonry. Causes of the
    impossibility of agreement between States. The state of
    “predestination” of the Jews. Gold — the engine of the
    machinery of States. Significance of criticism. “Show”
    institutions. Weariness from word-spinning. How to take a
    grip of public opinion. Significance of personal initiative.
    The Super-Government.

    What form of administrative rule can be given to communities
    in which corruption has penetrated everywhere, communities where
    riches are attained only by the clever surprise tactics of semi-
    swindling tricks; where looseness reigns: where morality is
    maintained by penal measures and harsh laws but not by
    voluntarily accepted principles: where the feelings toward faith
    and country are obliterated by cosmopolitan convictions? What
    form of rule is to be given to these communities if not that
    despotism which I shall describe to you later? We shall create an
    intensified centralization of government in order to grip in
    [our] hands all the forces of the community. We shall regulate
    mechanically all the actions of the political life of our
    subjects by new laws. These laws will withdraw one by one all the
    indulgences and liberties which have been permitted by the goyim,
    and our kingdom will be distinguished by a despotism of such
    magnificent proportions as to be at any moment and in every place
    in a position to wipe out any goyim who oppose us by deed or
    word.
    We shall be told that such a despotism as I speak of is not
    consistent with the progress of these days, but I will prove to
    you that it is.
    In the times when the peoples looked upon kings on their
    thrones as on a pure manifestation of the will of God, they
    submitted without a murmur to the despotic power of kings: but
    from the day when we insinuated into their minds the conception
    of their own rights they began to regard the occupants of thrones
    as mere ordinary mortals. The holy unction of the Lord’s Anointed
    has fallen from the heads of kings in the eye of the people, and
    when we also robbed them of their faith in God the might of power
    was flung upon the streets into the place of public
    proprietorship and was seized by us.
    Moreover, the art of diflecting masses and individuals by
    means of cleverly manipulated theory and verbiage, by regulations
    of life in common and all sorts of other quirks, in all which the
    goyim understand nothing, belongs likewise to the specialists of
    our administrative brain. Reared on analysis, observation, on
    delicacies of fine calculation, in this species of skill we have
    no rivals, any more than we have either in the drawing up of
    plans of political actions and solidarity. ln this respect the
    Jesuits alone might have compared with us, but we have contrived
    to discredit them in the eyes of the unthinking mob as an overt
    organization, while we ourselves all the while have kept our
    secret organization in the shade. However, it is probably all the
    same to the world who is its sovereign lord, whether the head of
    Catholicism or our despot of the blood of Zion! But to us, the
    Chosen People, it is very far from being a matter of
    indifference.
    For a time perhaps we might be successfully dealt with by a
    coalition of the GOYIM of all the world: but from this danger we
    are secured by the discord existing among them whose roots are so
    deeply seated that they can never now be plucked up. We have set
    one against another the personal and national reckonings of the
    goyim, religious and race hatreds, which we have fostered into a
    huge growth in the course of the past twenty centuries. This is
    the reason why there is not one State which would anywhere
    receive support if it were to raise its arm, for every one of
    them must bear in mind that any agreement against us would be
    unprofitable to itself. We are too strong–there is no evading
    our power. The nations cannot come to even an inconsiderable
    private agreement without our secretly having a hand in it.
    “Per Me reges regnant”. (“It is through me that Kings
    reign.”) And it was said by the prophets that we were chosen by
    God Himself to rule over the whole earth. God has endowed us with
    genius that we may be equal to our task. Were genius in the
    opposite camp it would still struggle against us, but even so a
    newcomer is no match for the old-established settler; the
    struggle would be merciless between us, such a fight as the world
    has never yet seen. Aye, and the genius on their side would have
    arrived too late. All the wheels of the machinery of all States
    go by the force of the engine, which is in our hands, and that
    engine of the machinery of States is Gold. The science of
    political economy invented by our learned elders has for long
    past been giving royal prestige to capital.
    Capital, if it is to co-operate untrammelled, must be free
    to establish a monopoly of industry and trade: this is already
    being put in execution by an unseen hand in all quarters of the
    world. This freedom will give political force to those engaged in
    industry, and that will help to oppress the people. Nowadays it
    is more important to disarm the peoples than to lead them into
    war; more important to use for our advantage the passions which
    have burst into flames than to quench their fire; more important
    to catch up and interpret the ideas of others to suit ourselves
    than to eradicate them. The principal object of our directorate
    consists in this: to debilitate the public mind by criticism; to
    lead it away from serious reflections calculated to arouse
    resistance; to distract the forces of the mind towards a sham
    fight of empty eloquence.
    In all ages the peoples of the world, equally with
    individuals, have accepted words for deeds, for they are content
    with a show and rarely pause to note, in the public arena,
    whether promises are followed by performance. Therefore we shall
    establish show institutions which will give eloquent proof of
    their benefit to progress.
    We shall assume to ourselves the liberal physiognomy of all
    parties, of all directions, and we shall give that physiognomy a
    voice in orators who will speak so much that they will exhaust
    the patience of their hearers and produce an abhorrence of
    oratory.
    In order to put public opinion into our hands we must bring
    it into a state of bewilderment by giving expression from all
    sides to so many contradictory opinions and for such length of
    time as will suffice to make the GOYIM lose their heads in the
    labyrinth and come to see that the best thing is to have no
    opinion of any kind in matters political, which it is not given
    to the public to understand, because they are understood only by
    him who guides the public. This is the first secret.
    The second secret requisite for the success of our
    government is comprised in the following: To multiply to such an
    extent national failings, habits, passions, conditions of civil
    life, that it will be impossible for anyone to know where he is
    in the resulting chaos, so that the people in consequence will
    fail to understand one another. This measure will also serve us
    in another way, namely, to sow discord in all parties, to
    dislocate all collective forces which are still unwilling to
    submit to us, and to discourage any kind of personal initiative
    which might in any degree hinder our affair. There is nothing
    more dangerous than personal initiative; if it has genius behind
    it, such initiative can do more than can be done by million, of
    people among whom we have sown discord. We must so direct the
    education of the goyim communities that whenever they come upon a
    matter requiring initiative they may drop their hands in
    despairing impotence. The strain which results from freedom of
    action saps the forces when it meets with the freedom of another.
    >From this collision arise grave moral shocks, disenchantments,
    failures. By all these means we shall so wear down the GOYIM that
    they will be compelled to offer us international power of a
    nature that by its position will enable us without any violence
    gradually to absorb all the State forces of the world and to form
    a Super-Government. In place of the rulers of to-day we shall set
    up a bogey which will be called the Super-Government
    Administration. Its hands will reach out in all directions like
    nippers and its organization will be of such colossal dimensions
    that it cannot fail to subdue all the nations of the world.

  8. PROTOCOL NO. 6

    Monopolies; upon them depend the fortunes of the goyim.
    Taking of the land out of the hands of the aristocracy.
    Trade, Industry and Speculation. Luxury. Rise of wages and
    increase of price in the articles of primary necessity.
    Anarchism and drunkeness. Secret meaning of the propaganda
    of economic theories.

    We shall soon begin to establish huge monopolies, reservoirs
    of colossal riches, upon which even large fortunes of the goyim
    will depend to such an extent that they will go to the bottom
    together with the credit of the States on the day after the
    political smash….
    You gentlemen here present who are economists, just strike
    an estimate of the significance of this combination!
    In every possible way we must develop the significance of
    our Super-Government by representing it as the Protector and
    Benefactor of all those who voluntarily submit to us.
    The aristocracy of the goyim as a political force, is dead –
    – we need not take it into account; but as landed proprietors
    they can still be harmful to us from the fact that they are self-
    sufficing in the resources upon which they live. It is essential
    therefore for us at whatever cost to deprive them of their land.
    This object will be best attained by increasing the burdens upon
    landed property — in loading lands with debt. These measures
    will check land-holding and keep it in a state of humble and
    unconditional submission.
    The aristocrats of the goyim, being hereditarily incapable
    of contenting themselves with little, will rapidly burn up and
    fizzle out.
    At the same time we must intensively patronize trade and
    industry, but, first and foremost, speculation, the part played
    by which is to provide a counterpoise to industry: the absence of
    speculative industry will multiply capital in private hands and
    will serve to restore agriculture by freeing the land from
    indebtedness to the land banks. What we want is that industry
    should drain off from the land both labour and capital and by
    means of speculation transfer into our hands all the money of the
    world, and thereby throw all the goyim into the ranks of the
    proletariat. Then the goyim will bow down before us, if for no
    other reason but to get the right to exist.
    To complete the ruin of the industry of the goyim we shall
    bring to the assistance of speculation the luxury which we have
    developed among the goyim, that greedy demand for luxury which is
    swallowing up everything. We shall raise the rate of wages which,
    however, will not bring any advantage to the workers, for at the
    same time, we shall produce a rise in prices of the first
    necessaries of life, alleging that it arises from the decline of
    agriculture and cattle breeding: we shall further undermine
    artfully and deeply sources of production, by accustoming the
    workers to anarchy and to drunkenness and side by side therewith
    taking all measure to extirpate from the fact of the earth all
    the educated forces of the GOYIM.
    In order that the true meaning of things may not strike the
    GOYIM before the proper time we shall mask it under an alleged
    ardent desire to serve the working classes and the great
    principles of political economy about which our economic theories
    are carrying on an energetic propaganda.

  9. PROTOCOL NO. 7

    Object of the intensification of armaments. Ferments,
    discords and hostility all over the world. Checking the
    opposition of the goyim by wars and by a universal war.
    Secrecy means success in the political. The Press and public
    opinion. The guns of America, China and Japan.

    The intensification of armaments, the increase of police
    forces — are all essential for the completion of the
    aforementioned plans. What we have to get at is that there should
    be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the
    masses of the proletariat, a few millionaries devoted to our
    interests, police and soldiers.
    Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with
    Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments,
    discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In
    the first place we keep in check all countries, for they well
    know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders
    or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in
    us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by
    our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have
    stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the
    political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations. In order to
    succeed in this we must use great cunning and penetration during
    negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is called the
    “official language,” we shall keep to the opposite tactics and
    assume the mask of honesty and compliancy. In this way the
    peoples and governments of the goyim, whom we have taught to look
    only at the outside whatever we present to their notice, will
    still continue to accept us as the benefactors and saviours of
    the human race.
    We must be in a position to respond to every act of
    opposition by war with the neighbours of that country which dares
    to oppose us: but if these neighbours should also venture to
    stand collectively together against us, then we must offer
    resistance by a universal war.
    The principal factor of success in the political is the
    secrecy of its undertakings: the word should not agree with the
    deeds of the diplomat.
    We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action
    in the direction favoured by our widely-conceived plan, already
    approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent
    as public opinion, secretly prompted by us through the means of
    that so-called “Great Power” — the Press, which, with a few
    exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our
    hands.
    In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments
    of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to
    one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the
    possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with
    the guns of America or China or Japan.

  10. PROTOCOL NO. 8

    Ambiguous employment of juridical rights. Assistants of the
    Masonic directorate. Special schools and super-educational
    training. Economists and millionaires. To whom to entrust
    responsible posts in the government.

    We must arm ourselves with all the weapons which our
    opponents might employ against us. We must search out in the very
    finest shades of expression and the knotty points of the lexicon
    of law justification for those cases where we shall have to
    pronounce judgments that might appear abnormally audacious and
    unjust, for it is important that these resolutions should be set
    forth in expressions that shall seem to be the most exalted moral
    principles cast into legal form. Our directorate must surround
    itself with all these forces of civilization among which it will
    have to work. It will surround itself with publicists, practical
    jurists, administrators, diplomats and, finally, with persons
    prepared by a special super-educational training in our special
    schools. These persons will have cognisance of all the secrets of
    the social structure, they will know all the languages that can
    be made up by political alphabets and words; they will be made
    acquainted with the whole underside of human nature, with all its
    sensitive chords on which they will have to play. These chords
    are the cast of mind of the goyim, their tendencies,
    shortcomings, vices and qualities, the particularities of classes
    and conditions. Needless to say that the talented assistants of
    authority, of whom I speak, will be taken not from among the
    goyim, who are accustomed to perform their administrative work
    without giving themselves the trouble to think what its aim is,
    and never consider what it is needed for. The administrators of
    the goyim sign papers without reading them, and they serve either
    for mercenary reasons or from ambition.
    We shall surround our government with a whole world of
    economists. That is the reason why economic sciences form the
    principal subject of the teaching given to the Jews. Around us
    again will be a whole constellation of bankers, industrialists,
    capitalists and — the main thing millionaires, because in
    substance everything will be settled by the question of figures.
    For a time, until there will no longer be any risk in
    entrusting responsible posts in our States to our brother Jews,
    we shall put them in the hands of persons whose past and
    reputation are such that between them and the people lies an
    abyss, persons who, in case of disobedience to our instructions,
    must face criminal charges or disappear — this in order to make
    them defend our interests to their last gasp.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The maximum upload file size: 512 MB. You can upload: image, audio, video, document, spreadsheet, interactive, text, archive, code, other. Links to YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and other services inserted in the comment text will be automatically embedded. Drop files here